Talk:Tracy Morgan

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tracy Morgan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Comedy High‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 8 to 14, 2014 (25th)

Csection added to question the neutrality of the "Controversy" section?

I just noticed that someone added a template to question the neutrality of the "Controversy" section of this article, but that person did not post on the Talk Page to discuss making this move.

I'm honestly confused as to why that was added and the specific reasoning, and I say that as someone who has no investment in Tracy Morgan's career. I would just like to see an explanation for what is wrong with that section so it could potentially be improved. I'll also tag the user who placed the template there.

@FMSky - Usually, before you place a template like that, you post on the article's Talk Page to gain a consensus from other editors, or at least to explain why you did, or mention something in an edit note. You did not post on the Talk Page or leave an edit note explaining why you did that. Your edit note only addressed removing some information that had Fox News as a source (which I agree with). I should make it clear - I don't necessarily have a problem with the Csection template being there! But I was just confused because it didn't seem any different or more inappropriate from other articles that have "Controversy" sections. Elaboration would be appreciated :)

Actually, I'm updating this to state that I just read WP:CRITICISM and I totally see your point now. I apologize!

I don't really see how that information can remain in the article, though, given that it doesn't seem that most of it would flow with any other sections of the article. It almost seems as if the information would ideally be removed entirely (maybe with the exception of the 2022 lawsuit, since that would flow decently with the part of the article discussing his career as a whole). The other info seems like it would only be suited for a "Controversies" section. What are your thoughts? Afddiary (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i didnt know you had to start a talk page discussion before placing a template, thats honestly news to be. But yes, i placed it because its discouraged per WP:CRITICISM as you noted (or more specifically WP:CSECTION). Normally i would just incorporate the section into others but in this case it is indeed not so easy --FMSky (talk) 06:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]