This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
For a simple mistake I saved the article in progress. It has been redirected to another wikipedia article but it is not correct because the two articles are very different in their content: the first speak about the Balsamic Vinegar, the second is focused on the Traditional Balsamic vinegar, the only aged product. I am a researcher in the vinegar science and coauthors of more than 50 scientific papers. Please let me complete the artcile I am preparing.
This seems like a slightly biased article.... the table near the bottom seems like it's condescending.... I know you're an expert, but TBV isn't necessarily The Best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenzieone (talk • contribs) 17:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase "the basis of the vineyards ampelographic" is not English. If it is a translation of an Italian technical term, please explain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.197.221 (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A long time ago someone included some references that were just "....." presumably meaning that the reference should refer to the previous one? But, over time the reference positions have changed and got merged, so there is one reference in multiple spots that is completely unclear in what it is referring to. Reconrabbit02:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]