Talk:Trident University International

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Trident University International. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Trident University International at the Reference desk.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Brandonrowe (talk · contribs) / Trident University International Trident University International This user has declared a connection. (COI declared in multiple edit summaries e.g., 14:52, September 23, 2013‎.)

Redirect

I suggest that the page "TUI University" should be moved to a new page name of: Trident University, and that this page become a redirect. Objections/concerns? Musides (talk) 22:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made the move. --Musides (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Media content needed

It would be ideal to have some additional media content in this article. Perhaps a photo of the headquarters, etc. --Musides (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General Comments

To whom it may concern, please stop vandalizing the article. Instead discuss the removal of content here first. Thank you. 67.127.185.150 (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accreditation

Relating to the statement: Although Trident University is regionally accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, its accreditation is threatened by allegations that it has "fail[ed] to ensure that students transferring in [to its undergraduate program] had fulfilled their general education requirements and, more importantly, [failed] to tell the accreditor about the problem."Is the university no longer having concerns with accreditation? I could not find the notice on their new website. Royalhistorian (talk) 08:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still on probation: [1]. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WASC has removed Trident from Show Cause status and placed them on probation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.203.152.138 (talk) 03:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accreditation whitewashing

Several unlogged IPs have deleted the same content multiple times over the span of nearly three months, under the guise of "helpful changes." Editors who view this page should beware of of "whitewashing" of the section regarding accreditation.

I've semi-protected the page for a month, discussion of the issue can carry on here on the talk page for that time. Anonymous and newly-registered editors are welcome to make their case here to change the article. Franamax (talk) 05:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is doing a fine job discussing the accreditation issue. If/when probation is resolved, it will make sense to move the content to a historical section describing the action while it would no longer make sense at the heading of the page. To anyone who is seeking to improve the image of the university, I think a simple task is required: contribute substantive and constructive content about the university. Surely this article requires more content to better represent the university and the work that it does. --Musides (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be worthwhile having an "Accreditation" section heading for this article? Audit Guy (talk) 06:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, and if either the whole article or the accreditation stuff was longer, I would say definitely - though I'll steer clear of any actual content opinions, I'm uninvolved here. But realistically, how much of the lede section would end up in the lede anyway, given that it is (presumably) a pertinent and thus lede-worthy fact? The end result might just be to describe the accreditation issue twice. Maybe you should just try it out. :) Franamax (talk) 08:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now he or she is back to try to remove this important information once again. The information is important and shouldn't be deleted without discussion. But it's also historical information so I've moved it out of the lead and into a new "History" section. ElKevbo (talk) 04:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page Vandalism

Somebody keeps reversing important edits to the page and has now put it under restricted access. This meddling must stop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.57.65 (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the page protected by people who are reversing the edits? 76.246.47.179 (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the mention of doctoral programs from this article? ElKevbo (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trident University International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150320003820/http://www.trident.edu:80/why-trident/history/ to https://www.trident.edu/why-trident/history/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]