Talk:Tullimonstrum

Tullimonstrum is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 5, 2022	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Mid‑importance

Tullimonstrum is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Lamprey#Morphology|arcualia]] The anchor (#Morphology) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Taxonomy

Can't we wait that the scientific community debates and settle on this before we put that it is a lamprey in the taxobox? This has been modified the day of the publication of the article. Wikipedia isn't a science news journal, it should reflect a consensus and now we don't know if it is a consensus since this result is too fresh. A mention in a paragraph would be, for now, enough. Nicobola (talk) 23:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the taxobox should just show the most inclusive clade that can be agreed upon... FunkMonk (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Size?

Why the hell isn't the animal's estimated SIZE not listed anywhere in the text of the article? Were it not for the 10mm rule displayed in the image of the fossil, one would have no reason not to believe the 'monster' was 20 meters long! A pretty pathetic oversight, IMHO. -70.251.67.255 (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if it bothers you THAT MUCH, why don't you put in the size estimate yourself, instead of whine about it?--Mr Fink (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

most of the fossils I've seen personally range in size from as small as say 3 inches and 1 inch wide, and sometimes 3 inches long and 2 inches wide in the same size category, to roughly a foot long and 2-3 inches wide, it varies greatly as they are soft animals, so they can wind up distorted in situ, if its soft bodied, it typically isn't going to be anywhere near 20m long, its hard enough to find hard bodied fossils that big. pretty pathetic to nitpick the article because you think every monster is the loch-ness monster. --66.169.105.182 (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Reconstruction In Progress

Today's progress in redrawing my picture of Tullimonstrum. [1] What do you guys think?--Mr Fink (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So far, looks good, I like the combination of one in a dynamic pose and the other in a more neutral pose. By the way, what are the things in the bottom of the image? --Rextron (talk) 07:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At bottom is the head of the local chondrichthyid, Polysentor.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

some news - possible vertebrate

https://phys.org/news/2019-11-mysterious-tully-monster-fossil.html 104.169.44.247 (talk) 01:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]