Talk:Tuminec

Albania Low‑importance

	Tuminec is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Populated exclusively by...

Please, such a sentence is too much. Either word it like: Macedonian nationalists from the 1980s have argued that the village was exclusively populated by orthodox ethnic Macedonians or outright remove it. Or find a real source - census results or something. I'll wait some time and then remove the ridiculous claim. --Laveol ^T 16:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The village is populated by ethnic Macedonians, but the religious piece better stay out. Not encyclopaedic mixing ethnicity with religion. Strangearticles (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian name and order

I'll be reverting back to the stable versions of these articles until we reach a consensus here. Per the last Albanian census, 97% of the residents of Pustec Municipality are ethnic Macedonians. The municipality forms a Macedonian minority zone. The Macedonian language is recognized as a minority language in Albania. The flag of Pustec Municipality bears an ethnic Macedonian symbol. Geographically, North Macedonia is right next to Pustec. Whether Bulgarian belongs in the lead, I'm not sure. But if it is to be there, it definitely should be ordered last. I don't see any policies suggesting alphabetizing is required. --Local hero ^talk 18:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarians traditionally lived here long before Macedonians arose as separate people and still live here. I do not see reason to delete the Bulgarian language from this article. Jingiby (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with keeping the Bulgarian name for the historical relevance I suppose. I'll re-add, ordered last as described above. Thanks. --Local hero ^talk 18:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian name was deleted from article without any explanation by Macedonian editor one year ago. Jingiby (talk) 19:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was added by a Bulgarian editor one year before that. Prior to that, I'm not sure it was ever on this article. --Local hero ^talk 19:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the Bulgarian name is good for historical relevance WhisperToMe (talk) 19:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I agree. The ordering was fine as it was.Beat of the tapan (talk) 09:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]