Talk:Type 97 ShinHōtō Chi-Ha medium tank

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:42, November 7, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Merge

This article essentially duplicates the information already found in the main article on the Type 97. I recommend the merger of the information here into the other article. GMan552 (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Information here can be simply made into a section. Plus the writing for most of this article seems heavily biased, poorly supported, and badly phrased. If possible, please delete as soon as possible because speaking quite honestly, this is a nightmare once you take the time to process the "information" contained therein. AllStarZ (talk) 05:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really was unable to find a good place to merge this and it seems to be a decent article (mind you, I don't know much about Japanese military history), so I just deleted the tag. If you want to merge it, go ahead, I have no objection myself. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should remain a separate article and has been improved and RS cited since the discussion above. Kierzek (talk) 15:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]