This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Valeriana (city) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
The article provides a map location that is certainly incorrect. The third reference cited (The Smithsonian) has nice map that indicates that the proper location is at roughly 18.90344, -89.29695. 24.240.34.222 (talk) 20:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. I have cross-referenced with several publications (especially the one used in the article to Cambridge University Press), and while I managed to narrow one of the sites down to 18°53'49.3"N 89°19'57.1"W, I still search for confirmation of the main site. ♆ CUSH ♆23:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
