Jump to content

Talk:Victoria Sellers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This person is not notable

[edit]

Although I'm not nominating this article for deletion at this time, I think that it probably should be deleted. The first three short paragraphs show little if any notability, and the final paragraph just describes her troubles with the law. I think that this violates our WP:BLP standards. Herostratus (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There is nothing in the article that is worth keeping, so I think the simple solution is to replace the article with a redirect to Peter Sellers. Or, ProD then AfD. Notability is not inherited: being the child of notable parents, or having a notable friend, is not sufficient. Having legal problems is also not notable. Johnuniq (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Give the girl a break

[edit]

OK, fine, this person is considered notable, per having survived an AfD. Let her take her place beside Einstein and Raphael in our pantheon of biographical articles. But this person is not very notable and we don't have to highlight every detail of her personal life, especially if it shows her in a bad light. What's the point? She's just a little fish. So let's concentrate on her acting achievements etc. and not go into arrests or whatever, OK? Herostratus (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lets not worry about what light we cast people in, as long as it is an ACCURATE light. And let's not worry about what people think of this, or that-- let's just deal in FACTS and accurate detail, whether the subject is notable or not, so that Wikipedia readers can be fully enlightened and informed and can make up their own minds! (204.112.66.148 (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Notoriety is still fame

[edit]

Daughter of two celebrities, and central figure in a major Hollywood scandal that attracted a lot of attention. Plenty of jailbirds get their own page, without being famous for anything else. Also it would be interesting to know what she's been doing more recently. 86.176.178.94 (talk) 17:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She is currently...

[edit]

These claims should carry a date: ('As of xxxx'). Valetude (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]