Talk:Vietnam War order of battle: Australia

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / North America / Southeast Asia / United States / Cold War BL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

BL

This article has been rated as BL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Vietnam War order of battle: Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestion

G'day, overall this looks quite good. The only suggestion I have is to make it a little clearer what the citations cover. For instance, do they cover the whole section, or just the line they appear on? e.g. see the RAN section, do the citations just cover the helicopter flight, or the vessels as well? It might also be added (as prose) the fluctuations in the number of infantry battalions deployed, and the way they rotated, to make it clear that not all were deployed at the same time. Great work creating this, though. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, thanks for looking over this and for the cmts. All good points, I think this is mostly the drawback of the format I've adopted though. As such I will keep it as is for now as I'm not really interesting in investing any more time in moving this fwd at the moment (this was just something I did whilst I couldn't sleep). I will of cse keep these points in mind if / when I decide to come back to it at a later date though. Cheers. Anotherclown (talk) 00:09, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a fine bit of work. To add to AR's suggestions above, I'd also suggest adding the months for the dates which the major combat units arrived and departed. Nick-D (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I think I've started quite a few articles that way! A simple change/solution might just be to add a stem sentence to each section (something like: "The following Australian Army units were deployed:", with the generic refs that cover the whole section after the colon and then have dot pointed unit listings. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gday gents, I've made a few tweaks on the basis of these cmts now. Nick - months is a good idea will look to incorporate shortly. Anotherclown (talk) 10:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done the dates now, thanks again. Anotherclown (talk) 02:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]