As currently source, this article fails to establish that the company is (or rather, was, given the disappearance of its website) notable. Its sources are purely about getting funded and getting bought out... plus one dead source about having filed for a patent which, given its headline, was almost certainly a press release. I was going to refile AFD (the previous getting little response, with this support: Article is currently sourced to articles solely on company raising money or being acquired, plus a press release that they were applying for a patent. GoDuckGo search is not finding significantly more; a couple form interviews, a WP:FORBESCON piece, a three-sentence HuffPo reference, an article at CIO, a site whose articles are sortable by "sponsor", but scraping all that stuff away, the only thing I find of any substance are one article inspired by the patent application press release... but searching Google Scholar indicated that there were some papers using analysis by VoloMetrix products, and I didn't have the time to figure out all of what degree it is done, so I cannot say for sure if the problem is with the subject or merely the article, so for now I'm just raising the "notability" flag. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
