Talk:Vulvectomy

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Vulvectomy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

No sources at all

This article sounds authoritative and knowledgable, but has no references, sources, or citations. Someone could be making it all up -- or not, depending on who they are. But either way, and no matter who wrote this entry, references and sources must be added. Just sounding authoritative isn't good enough. So I added an {{original research}} tag. Timothy Perper (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked the edit history of the page. The article was written first by an anonymous editor who gave only an IP as an identifier. Other anonymous editors have added material as well, plus some cleanup editing by registered editors. So unless this article can be documented -- and I mean documented, not just asserted -- it probably should be deleted as completely untrustworthy. And no, it is NOT my responsibility to supply references. Timothy Perper (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article isn't made up and it should not be deleted, though I agree it absolutely needs to be improved upon with references. — Guillaume Pelletier ~ 17:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Factual errors

I am a physician assistant in gynecologic oncology. This page contains several factual errors. I hope to work on the page soon, but don't have time to do it right now... Csnyoung (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]