Talk:WeRobotics

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 December 2021 by reviewer AssumeGoodWraith (talk · contribs).

International development Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Robotics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Need a second opinion

Dear Timtrent, I'm not sure whether this entity passes the WP:NCORP. It has been passed and marked reviewed but I still have reservation on it. Your expert opinion matters. could you assist? -Hatchens (talk) 07:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hatchens As written, the article is poor, listing things rather than fair, continuous prose. The subject is notable, but has not been presented in a useful manner. Referencing is sufficient to demonstrate notability, but is not used well. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi both, I recognize the points about the writing. I've made a few tweaks, which may or may not address your concerns. CT55555 (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555 May I suggest taking a good look at your references, whcih are useful. Read User:Timtrent/A good article whcih is one of many essays on article creation. Look at the process outlined within it, and turn your references into a storyboard of what you want to write.. Then paragraph why paragraph, rewrite the article based on the sources. Be careful to use your own words.

Having a draft accepted is the start of the process. Turning a newly accepted article into a finished product is a task for not only you, but the community as a whole, but you are a great place to start. All you can do is your best. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @User:Timtrent I read some stuff by AfC people about keeping it short and simple to prove notability and then adding in more later. I've created a few new, this one is indeed shorter than others, so I'll consider this a work in progress and keep adding to it. CT55555 (talk) 12:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555 Short and simple got it accepted. Good. I've made a few small edits within it to give it a better framework. Amnarea to look at The company has worked in Peru, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, Nepal, Fiji, and Tanzania. Yes, it has worked there, but what did the references say about it and what it did. At present they are used to verify that it was present. Once you get to what is said about it then the flesh starts to arrive on the bones.

I think you aimed for brevity and overshot a little! That does not detract from the a cetane, nor the fact that it is presented to us and verified by references as notable. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten much of it, based on the feedback above. Ping @User talk:Timtrent @Hatchens CT55555 (talk) 13:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555 Looks much improved, thank you. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 15:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Timtrent Are you satisfied if I remove the "clean up" tag? CT55555 (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555 Sorry, please go ahead. I could have done that, but failed! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 15:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]