Talk:Wild River Review
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Now defunct! (Plus all its online citations)
[edit]For a relatively short-lived publication (10 years), this article is surely no longer notable, least of all its bombastic, soapy lead section. I reached it via a short but frustrating trail of dead ref links. We need to consider decisive remedial action against time-wasting caused by this and many other self-serving non-encyclopedic WP articles. Bjenks (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2019 (UTC)