This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
Is it correct, that absolutely nothing on this page is somehow proven or even referenced? Since no original research is allowed I wonder where all the nonsense in this article comes from. Please either delete the article or provide references for everything that is being said here! This is an encyclodpedia, not a collection of unsubstanciated opinions!
I see that, but has anybody ever read those referenced books and the website? Most of what is stated there is folklore, not scientifically proven stuff suited for an encyclopedia!
I myself have read the book. It is not folklore. The author, who was heavily involved in the case, interacted with both wildlife officials and natives, and makes it a point in separating native folklore from facts deduced by those who tracked the wolves down. He cannot be accused bias or of hating wolves, as later in the book, he comes to sympathise with them and states categorically that the wolves in question were not acting normally, and that loss of habitat was a likely cause. All references to folklore (such as the rural people's beliefs that the wolves were really demons) are stated to be just that: folklore.
The image Image:Indianwolf.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.