Talk:Zilog eZ80

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

about zilog ez80

what is the main use of zilog ez80? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.41.86 (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A general purpose microcontroller or CPU has no main use, it's up to you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.43.245 (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But if I recall correctly Zilog suggested that you use it to put web servers in everything like industrial machines, dishwashers, washing machines, toasters et.c. // Liftarn (talk)

Why hasn't anybody made a lightning fast ZX Spectrum clone? :D 84.49.75.226 (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

n Times faste than Z80?

The article states:

Available at up to 50 MHz (2004), the performance is comparable to a Z80 clocked at 200 MHz if fast memory is used […] or even higher in some applications (a 16-bit addition is 11 times as fast as in the original). <Omission and markup added by discussant.>

Keeping in mind that a Z80 is usually clocked with 2,5, 4 or maybe 8 MHz, the last bold striked clause seems to be irritating (at least 200 Mhz means we are talking about being 25 upto 80 times faster). I guess that there is meant that the eZ80 is 11 times faster at same clock speed as a Z80 regarding 16 bit addition. Please clarify. -- Pemu (talk) 11:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pemu The ADD HL, rr takes 1 cycle on the eZ80, but 3 cycles on the Z80. In this case, it is 3x the speed on this instruction alone. It doesn't make sense either. Imclevor (talk) 12:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It actually does to me. If the clock speed is 2-3x faster and the addition instruction is 3x faster, then it would be approximately 10x faster. Imclevor (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Imclevor: Are you sure about the cycles? As far as I remember, one distinguishes clock cycles and machine cycles (the latter consisting of round about 4 clock cycles each). I am not familiar with Z80 programming, but ADD HL,… takes about 11 cycles according to [1]. This feels like 3 machine cycles. -- Pemu (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

24bit?

@Maury Markowitz: I would argue that the eZ80 is both an 8-bit and a 24-bit processor. The ALU is 24 bit. The registers are 24 bit although they can be used as three 8-bit registers. The instruction set consists of instructions for 8-bit data (legacy Z80) and instructions for 24-bit data. Similarly, the NEC V20 / V30 would be both 16-bit processors and 8-bit processors because they have an 8080 mode. Cheers, Drahtlos (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been hashed over repeatedly for the last 20 years - the ALU size does not define the categorization. The Nova was a 16-bit machine in spite of having a 4-bit ALU, and the Z80 was an 8-bit machine in spite of having 16-bit instructions. This example a further extension of the original Z80 model in every way and the ISA remains very 8-bit oriented. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24-bit registers are split into three sections, two of which can be directly used. For example, the 24-bit HL register is comprised of three 8-bit sections: H, L, and HLU. HLU is the middle bytewhichbut cannot be used directly. In theory, it is possible to use HLU by bit- shifting, but it is easier just to use 3 8-bit registers for three 8-bit values. Imclevor (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with Drahtlos. All 24 bit instructions work like any 24 bit machine. There is even a 24 bit stack. It pushes 3 bytes so we are back on 8 bits at that point. Th 8 bit bus doesnt make it an 8 bit CPU. I's a mix. Please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71bDpegZJTs Robotics1 (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Although the eZ80 has 24-bit addressing and 24-bit add, subtract, and loads for those addresses, nearly every other arithmetic, logic, or shift function is limited to 8 bits. The Z80 supports 16-bit add, subtract, and loads too but nobody claims it is a 16-bit processor. RastaKins (talk) 21:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Compatibility

The eZ80 is not totally compatible with the Z80 as the article claims. Certain useless but documented instructions change behaviour. In practice this is not a problem because normal code does not use those instructions but for the general case it is not a true statement. 82.71.94.194 (talk) 12:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]