Template:Did you know nominations/Abortion in Guinea
Appearance
DYK toolbox |
---|
Abortion in Guinea
- ... that Guinea has a law banning abortion, but an interpretation of the law says that receiving an abortion is not illegal?
- Source: [1] [my translation] For this legal journalist, the Guinean penal code cannot condemn a woman who has had an abortion.
Moved to mainspace by Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.
— Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 04:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC).
- Not surprising or interesting, most abortion laws focus on prosecuting abortion providers rather than recipients. (t · c) buidhe 06:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Vigilantcosmicpenguin: Please address the above.--Launchballer 09:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- How about this kind of similar statement:
- ALT1: ... that lawyers disagree about which circumstances allow legal abortion in Guinea?
- Source: [2]
— Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 17:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Vigilantcosmicpenguin: Please address the above.--Launchballer 09:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems: - "Cases" seem to be a magnet for otherwise irrelevant abortion stories that hit the news for one or two days. Perhaps it would be better to remove that section.
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting: - People discussing in which circumstances a law may or may not be applicable happens with basically all laws. In special laws about controversial stuff, such as abortion.
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Cambalachero (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)