Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Al Jalama, Tulkarm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 22:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Al Jalama, Tulkarm

[edit]

Created/expanded by Huldra (talk) & Tiamut (talk). Self nom at 22:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bellavista housing estate
  • Requesting second opinion Technically everything is fine, hook is referenced by an offline source. Article is 9 x expanded starting on Oct 18. This is a day late but I think this should be okay according to our leniency rules. I do have a concern about the main section of this article 1948, and aftermath: I am no expert in the various conflicts in this area but it seems to me that the article advances only one position, that of the Palestinians. After reading a few pages of the only reference for this section, the book by Meron Benvenisti, this impression also extends to the book. I would like to ask another DYK regular to advance an opinion whether this section is WP:NPOV or not. --Pgallert (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment: I welcome a second opinion. There are two sources on the section "1948, and aftermath", both are Israeli: Benny Morris and Meron Benvenisti. The on-line source (Benvenisti) has clearly more information on the Palestinian Arab view, than Morris. I am not aware of any more information about the "kibbutznik" than what already is in the article: they clam that IDF told them to do what they did, while IDF denies this. Huldra (talk) 09:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Second opinion: I have had a look at the English and Hebrew versions of the article, and concluded that it fairly presents the facts.
    • Offline hook reference AGF. Good to go. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2011 (UTC)