Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Dhakeshwari Mata Temple, Kumortuli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by WBGconverse 17:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Dhakeshwari Mata Temple, Kumortuli

[edit]
  • ... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Created/expanded by শক্তিশেল (talk). Self-nominated at 13:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC).

  • No hook and article is in bad shape prose-wise. Juxlos (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @শক্তিশেল: Reopened upon reconsideration. You need to say something for the hook in DYK, something interesting about the subject of the article. Juxlos (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
  • It appears that the article-creator has not responded.So, the final review goes as:--
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: No - The entire article is actually written based on a single source, which is the piece from ABP. All other pieces cover a different temple of the same name in Bangladesh.Also, the line in lead:-- Now, the temple of Kolkata is quite deserted as most of the people are not aware of its historical backdrop and importance can't be sourced to the Scroll piece, as is supposed to be. Adarbepari.com is an unreliable source.
  • Neutral: Yes
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Yes
  • Other problems: No - Fails to pass our notability guidelines, as of now. Pathetic prose quality which resembles machine translation from the corresponding Bengali sources.

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - No hook
  • Interesting: No - NA
QPQ: None required.

Overall: WBGconverse 17:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)