Template:Did you know nominations/Double Tenth Agreement
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BuySomeApples (talk) 21:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Double Tenth Agreement
- ... that the USA and USSR shared the same goals in China during the Double Tenth Agreement?
5x expanded by Apot8511 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC).
The article has been expanded enough and I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. The sentence in the lead - "The agreement was signed at what is now the Red Rock Village Museum in Chongqing." - should be referenced and it would probably be best for it to also be in the body of the article. The first paragraph in the China in 1945 section needs citations. "The battles resulted in a victory for Mao and the CCP which skewed the negotiations to Mao's favour." under the Events section needs a citation at the end, but I do see that the information is in the citation in the next paragraph so it should be easy to just repeat it up above. The last two issues are that the 5th reference and the 36th reference have formatting errors. SL93 (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging Apot8511, but they seem to be a student editor that has not edited recently, so I'm not sure if they will pick up. --LordPeterII (talk) 21:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- @SL93: I found those references are to the same NYT article, so I have fixed them. No comment on anything else though. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 06:23, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- SL93, it's been another month, and it's also now two months since the nominator has edited on Wikipedia. It's time to render a final verdict on this nomination, unless you'd prefer to render a temporary one while you ask at WT:DYK whether anyone would like to address what issues remain for this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
