Template:Did you know nominations/Dragonesque brooch
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 15:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dragonesque brooch
_(cropped).jpg)
Dragonesque brooch found in Yorkshire
- ... that if the double-headed Romano-British dragonesque brooch type represents any real animal, it may be hares rather than dragons? Source: Johns, Catherine, The Jewellery of Roman Britain: Celtic and classical traditions, p. 152, 1996, UCL Press, google books
Created by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 23:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dragonesque brooch; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Forgot to include - new article started 16 December
New article, long enough, sourced throughout. Hook is sourced and mentioned in the article. Image displays clearly as a thumbnail and greatly enhances the hook so should be given the image slot. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnbod and Ficaia: Interesting article. I found the hook fact in the article and cited - the fact is found at the bottom of page 152. I think our hook does a good job of saying they might be hares. But our readers are likely going to be drawn in by dragons. Bruxton (talk) 15:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)