Template:Did you know nominations/Eden of Coronet (guitar)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Eden of Coronet (guitar)
- ...
that the Eden of Coronet is the most expensive guitar in the world?Source: In 2015 the guitar was valued at 7.3 million dirhams or 2 million U.S. Dollars making it the most expensive guitar in the world.- ALT1: ... that the Eden of Coronet guitar is covered in 1.6 kilograms (3.5 lb) of gold and 11,441 diamonds? Source: It has more than 11,441 diamonds (400 carats) and 1.6 kilograms of white gold.
ALT2: ... that the Eden of Coronet (guitar) is valued at 2 million U.S. dollars?Source: In 2015 the guitar was valued at two million dollars or 7.3 million dirhams making it the most expensive guitar in the world.- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Jones
Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 19:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC).
- Comment Since multiple countries use the dirham, you should probably specify which one it is for clarity. Ornithoptera (talk) 23:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note. I updated the article, so all hooks need to be adjusted for the fact that the guitar no longer holds that record. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 02:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Mandarax and Ornithoptera: When researching the article I made note of the fact that celebrity owned guitars sold for much more, but my research led me to believe this may be the most expensive non-celebrity/auctioned guitar - but still confusing to claim. I think we can still have a catchy hook with ALT1 and 2 rewritten as I have. Bruxton (talk) 04:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
the article is barely long enough and barely notable. A QPQ was done. The hook is cited and the image is free. It passes earwig. --evrik (talk) 03:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
