The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that the Haravijaya has been praised in many Sanskrit anthologies and works on rhetorics? Source: Peter Pasedach 2011 p.6–7.
Reviewed:
Comment: A mahākāvya not studied very often due to its length and technical difficulty. There are a surprising number of gaps in Wikipedia's coverage of Sanskrit and Dharmic literature generally, I'm happy to bring an article from a neglected area to DYK. regards,
Created by TryKid (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Overall: A QPQ is not needed. Both theses are acceptable sources per the explanation given at Talk:Haravijaya. The article is long enough and new enough with no copyright violations. The nominator can choose the hook. SL93 (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. I am fine with either hook, though ALT0 does indeed sound more impressive, and might work better as an "interesting" hook. regards, TryKid[dubious – discuss] 14:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
A QPQ is not needed. Both theses are acceptable sources per the explanation given at Talk:Haravijaya. The article is long enough and new enough with no copyright violations. The nominator can choose the hook. SL93 (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)