Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Jeff Banister

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Jeff Banister

[edit]

Jeff Banister on June 13, 2012

  • Reviewed: IOU Template:Did you know nominations/Cengiz Aktar
  • Comment: This is the pre-expansion version, at 2057 bytes of prose. That would mean 10,285 is a full 5x expansion. At the moment, it's at 9,927 characters. I'll try to get those last 300+ characters, but I think this expansion should suffice in case I can't. I just need to stop working on this right now so I can get back to my actual job. The image could work if it's cropped, possibly.

5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self nominated at 16:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC).

  • I can confirm the article was at 2057 bytes and that the expansion started on October 16. The article is at 10,092 bytes now, still a bit short of 10,285, but I'd support promoting it regardless. So: inline citations are used throughout. I could not detect any bias or WP:BLP problems. The sources look fine. Did a couple of spotchecks for close paraphrasing - no problems found. The article seems to be developed to a high quality otherwise (looks like a GA to me).
  • The hook is properly formed, interesting, appears in the text, and is backed by inline refs.
  • The image is properly licensed. It kinda works, a crop could work too - not sure about that, so I'd welcome a second opinion.
  • So, while I'm on the fence regarding the image, the only thing that's missing is the QPQ review. GregorB (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I totally missed this. Thanks for your review. I've conducted a QPQ review. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • And I expanded it a little more, so now it's at 10,298! – Muboshgu (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Good to go, then. (Sorry for the delay, I have been away for a while.) GregorB (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)