Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Lukas Lundin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Lukas Lundin

[edit]
[[File:|120x133px|Super-yacht Savannah ]]
Super-yacht Savannah

Created by Edwardx (talk). Self-nominated at 00:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough, long enough (over 1,600 characters), and generally within policy (it is neutral, quite well cited, and free of any plagiarism concerns, for the prose at least). The hook is short enough, neutral, well cited, and free of any apparent copyright-related issues. The image is nominally freely licensed (CC-BY-SA-4.0), used in the article, and shows up well at thumbnail size; however, a reverse Google Image search show this photo is probably a copyvio (see especially its use, with watermark, on superyachts.com). I believe the image should be removed from this nomination and the article itself, and nominated for deletion. Other than that, though, this article looks good to go to me, and I'll be ready to pass it as soon as QPQ is done. Nice work! Michael Barera (talk) 04:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  • QPQ now done. Edwardx (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination now good to go without the image, which I still believe is a likely copyvio. Michael Barera (talk) 04:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
  • This article seems awfully sketchy. He's the chairman of a few companies...he's a billionaire...he owns a super-yacht. While all of this is reliably sourced, it feels like less than a start-class article. Yoninah (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Yoninah. I have just expanded it significantly. Edwardx (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Much better, thanks! No close paraphrasing seen in expansion. Rest of review per Michael Barera. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 13:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)