Template:Did you know nominations/Ontario Highway 23
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ontario Highway 23
[edit]... that Ontario Highway 23, running through the counties of Perth and Wellington, was first established in 1927?
- Reviewed: Not a self-nomination.
Improved to Good Article status by Floydian (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 19:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC).
- I generally avoid nominations unless there is something interesting about the highway to share; but I guess since DYK is pretty underfilled, I'll remain mum on this one. However, I'd recommend this slightly more interesting hook:
... that Ontario Highway 23 was extended into Middlesex County as part of a depression-relief program?
- Cheers, Floydian τ ¢ 22:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)\
Length, promotion date, cites all good. Accepting ALT1 oGF. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Regarding the depression-relief program, the article simply says "Highway 23 was extended from Highway 8 to Highway 7", with no mention of Middlesex County. If ALT1 is to go ahead, the hook fact should be stated clearly in the article, IMO. 97198 (talk) 12:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- How are you seeing the ref? Am I looking at the wrong one? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, I mean the wiki article itself. 97198 (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ohhh, I get it. Ok, let's go for another:
- ALT2 ... that Ontario Highway 23 was extended from Highway 8 to Highway 7 as part of a Depression-relief program?
- That looks good and avoids the reference that most would only see if they looked at a map of Ontario with county boundaries. - Floydian τ ¢ 23:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Review of ALT2 and update of User:Maury Markowitz's review above (which still stands). Offline citation #6 accepted AGF for ALT2. No need for QPQ. Citation #5 is flagged as uncategorized redirect but it works fine. No problems with disambigs or the other ext. links. Neutral and fully cited. No copyvio found; ext links checked. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, I mean the wiki article itself. 97198 (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- How are you seeing the ref? Am I looking at the wrong one? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
