Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Zachary
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Robert Zachary
[edit]- ...
that Robert Zachary was an expert on surgery on newborns?Source: "a champion for surgery of the newborn"
- Reviewed: Tore Johannessen
Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC).
Thanks @97198: New enough, long enough, hook in article and cited. No copyvio issues, QPQ done. Can you think of a more interesting hook? May be see this, As a result of their study of 526 children born between 1955 and 1962 and treated for myelomeningocele,they concluded that there was “no place for the selection of patients for conservative treatment rather than operative treatment on the grounds of paralysis, deformity or hydrocephalus present at birth.” As a result of this and similar studies published in the mid-1960s, most centers in the United Kingdom and United States adopted the practice of operating within 12 to 48 hours of birth on all infants who did not have other defects incompatible with life. However, later his colleague turned and discouraged it, abandoning the practice of treating most infants with the defect in favor of treating only the most promising cases.....also note...he had a spine deformity himself. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @97198 and Whispyhistory: Would these work?
ALT1 ... that Robert Zachary, who was an expert on surgery on newborns, argued that newborns should only be operated on by specifically trained paediatric surgeons?- ALT2 ... that Robert Zachary, who showed that babies with spina bifida had higher survival rates if they were operated on hours after birth, himself had a spinal condition?
- There might be a better way to reword ALT2, but I agree with Whispy that that direction is quite promising. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 21:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- ALT2 better, but too long to get full attention. I suggest trim it based on the source you used... showed that a survival rate for affected babies could be changed from one of less than 10% to nearly 90%; ....and consider adding the source I gave you to add to article. Just the fact he and colleagues improved survival from 10 to 90% is significant. Thank you all. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- ALT3 ... that pediatric surgeon Robert Zachary showed that newborns with spina bifida being operated hours after birth would increase their survival rate from 10% to 90%?
- @97198 and Whispyhistory: How's that? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, much better but can read better (rephrase ALT3 or shorten ALT2). I added the original paper. It was Zachary and colleagues. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:26, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- ALT2 better, but too long to get full attention. I suggest trim it based on the source you used... showed that a survival rate for affected babies could be changed from one of less than 10% to nearly 90%; ....and consider adding the source I gave you to add to article. Just the fact he and colleagues improved survival from 10 to 90% is significant. Thank you all. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- @97198 and Whispyhistory: Would these work?
- ALT4: ... that pediatric surgeon Robert Zachary and his colleagues improved the survival rate of babies with spina bifida from 10% to 90% by operating within hours of birth?
- @Whispyhistory: Thank you for reviewing and sorry about my absence. How do you like the wording of ALT4? 97198 (talk) 01:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
hook in article and cited. Thank you for great teamwork. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
