Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Samoan branch of the Nazi Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Samoan branch of the Nazi Party

  • Source: "support for Nazi Socialism and the NSDAP leader Matthes was, in the opinion of the Administration, strongest among the 'mixed-blood' Germans ... Matthes and the men that followed him were on the margins of the brotherhood of whiteness" from:
  • ALT1: ... that in 1938 the Samoan branch of the Nazi Party made plans to seize power in the Territory of Western Samoa? Source: "At the time of the Munich crisis in 1938 , when war seemed a distinct possibility , the Samoan Nazi planned to seize principal government institutions and broadcast the Nazi message to the Pacific" from: Field, Michael (1991). Mau: Samoa's Struggle for Freedom. Polynesian Press. p. 217. ISBN 978-0-908597-07-9.
  • ALT2: ... that non-white Samoan people were permitted to join the local branch of the Nazi Party in the 1930s? Source: "German settlers included their Samoan wives in a small local Nazi Party branch in the 1930s, again on the basis of shared Aryanism. This may be the world's only case of black Nazis" from: Belich, James (28 February 2002). Paradise Reforged: A History of the New Zealanders From the 1880s to the Year 2000. University of Hawaii Press. p. 238. ISBN 978-0-8248-2542-3.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Barat
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 855 past nominations.

Dumelow (talk) 08:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC).

  • Hello Dumelow, I am reviewing your DYK nomination.
Article was written recently and meets DYK raw prose size requirement.
Green tickY There is a QPQ. in Your Quid Pro Quo review, please note at Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Barat that they also need to complete a Quid Pro Quo.
Article is well written. Please do change formatting of the Flickr primary source used, the publisher isn't Flickr, rather it's the Adminstration/Police of Apia. Flickr is merely a webhost.
Merge duplicate source of Field Michael (1989); Reed p.219
Green tickY I personally find ALT2 hook the most punchy and precise. Specifying the years is important because this was before WW2 started, but still in formal days of Nazi rise to power. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 15:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Shushugah, thanks for the review. Good spot on that ref, I have merged it into a single citation. I removed "Flickr" from that other ref. Let me know if there is anything else you would like me to do - Dumelow (talk) 06:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
this DYK is ready and nominator addressed all my concerns ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)