Template:Did you know nominations/Santos Passos Church

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 talk 17:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Santos Passos Church

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

The Santos Passos Church in 1864

• ... that the Santos Passos Church (pictured) was built to replace a dilapidated chapel?

• Source:

Other hook, as suggested:

... that the Santos Passos Church (pictured) in Guimarães, Portugal was declared a royal chapel by King Luis I in 1878?

• Source:

• Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by V.B.Speranza (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

V.B.Speranza (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC).

• The full review is to follow, but right now I have a few concerns about the nomination. The first is that, despite being a newly-promoted GA, the lede seems rather short and seems to lack mentions of some of the other parts of the article; I'd suggest beefing it up a little. The second is that the hook is admittedly rather pedestrian as it's not uncommon for religious structures to replace pre-existing ones. The article is a GA and is thus full of suitable material so I'd suggest proposing additional hooks in the meantime. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @Narutolovehinata5: Done! V.B.Speranza (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! The article was promoted to GA status on time and it meets all of the regular DYK+GA requirements. I did not find any close paraphrasing. Since you have less than five DYK nominations a QPQ is not required. ALT1 might need some slight revisions: for example, "prerogative status" might be too specialist so an alternative, easier-to-understand phrasing could used here. The hook also doesn't make it clear it's in Portugal so that might need to be addressed to. The hook's source is in Portuguese so AGF, but a Google Translate check confirms the information. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

• • • • @Narutolovehinata5: So do you suggest removing the word prerogative? I just don’t see any word that can replace it without making it even more confusing… Any hook suggestion that might solve it? V.B.Speranza (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Would just saying "was declared a royal chapel by King Luis I" give the same meaning or would the nuance be lost? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

• • • • • • @Narutolovehinata5: Done. I think everything is ready now. V.B.Speranza (talk) 11:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
            • Just needs a mention of it being in Portugal and it should be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
              • @Narutolovehinata5: I’ve change it in a way I think it fits the phrase best, if you want you can change it in a way that suits you so we can finally conclude this. V.B.Speranza (talk) 18:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
                • Yeah, that should work now. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
                • Note to promoter: I've just made a minor change to the hook, rewording it for grammatical reasons and including the city. Technically this would mean that another editor will need to sign off my change. However, as the location is mentioned and referenced in the article and it doesn't fundamentally change the main hook fact, I hope that this can be promoted sans a re-review per IAR. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
                  • @Narutolovehinata5: Will it take long? This has been going on for a while now… V.B.Speranza (talk) 02:20, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

References