Template:Did you know nominations/Sheikh Jarrah property dispute
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BuySomeApples (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sheikh Jarrah property dispute
- ... that the deputy mayor of Jerusalem explained that the Sheikh Jarrah eviction cases are part of a municipal strategy to create “layers of Jews” throughout East Jerusalem? Source: Evictions in Jerusalem Become Focus of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, May 7, 2021: "But Mr. King, the deputy mayor, said “of course” they are part of a wider strategy of installing “layers of Jews” throughout East Jerusalem. That policy, Mr. King said, “is the way to secure the future of Jerusalem as a Jewish capital for the Jewish people.” “If we will not be in big numbers and if we will not be at the right places in strategic areas in East Jerusalem,” he added, then future peace negotiators “will try to divide Jerusalem and to give part of Jerusalem to our enemy.”"
Created by Enthusiast01 (talk) and Onceinawhile (talk). Nominated by Onceinawhile (talk) at 20:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- The framing of King explaining what the eviction cases are doesn't seem quite right, since it implies without sourcing that that's what they really are. How about "...described the Sheikh Jarrah eviction cases as part of...", or something like that?
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px: - Not quite clear enough at 100px, I don't think. Might need to add a different image to the article or run this without one.
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
The article is of course not perfect (but articles don't need to be perfect for DYK), and the talk page is quite something, as are the talk pages for a lot of articles under ARBPIA. But this nomination is eligible and almost ready to go. With that said, I've flagged two minor issues with the nom above. Once they're fixed, please use {{subst:DYK?again}} to request another reviewer to double-check. ezlevtlk/ctrbs 23:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
@Ezlev: thanks for this. I am fine with your proposed amendment to the hook. Many thanks.
Onceinawhile (talk) 07:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- This article is tagged for neutrality and there is an ongoing RFC in that regard. In my view, this should not proceed until it is resolved.Selfstudier (talk) 09:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Neutrality issues have not been addressed in the almost-two months since Selfstudier's comments. With how it appears that it won't be resolved anytime soon and the lack of activity on this nomination, it appears that there is no feasible path forward at this time. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. Ongoing issues with the article and a current rfc make it unlikely that this article ready anytime soon. It can be renominated if the article gets cleaned up and promoted to GA in the future. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)