Template:Did you know nominations/Vampyrellida
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Vampyrellida
Vampyrella lateritia
- ... that vampire amoebae (example pictured) are naked? Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S143446102100064X?via%3Dihub "All known vampyrellid amoebae are naked and filose, but the different species display a broad morphological variety."
This might make a good quirky hook.(?)
Improved to Good Article status by Snoteleks (talk). Nominated by BorgQueen (talk) at 11:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Vampyrellida; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- @Snoteleks: please suggest your alt hooks here. BorgQueen (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- BTW I'm not a reviewer, just the nominator.
BorgQueen (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
. Recently promoted to good article. The article is long enough, written neutrally, has inline citations and appears free of close paraphrasing/plagiarism (Earwig ✓). The hook is formatted correctly, interesting, cited inline, and would make a good quirky hook. (I would have gone with "free-living and naked"). The image is released under a free license and used in the article. gobonobo + c 20:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- BTW I'm not a reviewer, just the nominator.
