Template:Did you know nominations/Vivienne Rohner

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Vivienne Rohner

(

)

... that fashion model Vivienne Rohner was named after fashion designer Vivienne Westwood? Source: 20min.ch (if you don't read German it essentially says "Westwood inspired my parents when naming me".
- ALT1: ... ~~that fashion model Vivienne Rohner would have become a race car driver?~~ Source: Annabelle.ch (again in German, when asked what she would be doing if she didn't become a model she said race car driver)

Created by Trillfendi (talk). Self-nominated at 21:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC).

Article is eligible and sourced, assuming good faith for German sources, with the exception of the final line "She has also appeared on the cover of Vogue Netherlands." That needs a source. The first hook is sourced, interesting, and an appropriate length; ALT1 is not mentioned in the article, and would need to be in order to be usable for DYK. I'll also propose ALT0a:

ALT0a: ... that fashion model Vivienne Rohner, named after fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, opened one of Westwood's shows during her first season as a model?

Trillfendi, please request another review using {{DYK?again}} once you've fixed the issues I raised, since I've suggested an ALT which also needs review. For now, I'll leave a . ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

@Ezlev: Honestly, if you were going to make a review that would have to be thrown out it could've just been a comment. Trillfendi (talk) 18:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

It doesn't have to be thrown out, Trillfendi – I did a full review, so if you fix the two issues I pointed out, I expect that the next reviewer won't find any new issues. I've only asked you to request a new review afterward because I can't approve my own alternate hook. If you'd prefer it, I'll happily approve ALT0 and ALT1 if you ping me once the issues are fixed. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Thank you, Trillfendi, for this article; I enjoyed reading it. Two points: (1) ALTs 0 and 0a are fine, but ALT1 doesn't make sense. Rohner would have become a racing driver if what? Maybe it could be rephrased to say that she would have become a racing driver if she had not become a model, or maybe that if she had not been so successful as a model then she would have liked to have been a racing driver, or whatever. (2) ~~I see that you already have at least 5 DYKs, so please could you do a QPQ?~~ @Ezlev: If you would like to use your above review as a QPQ, or have already done so, that is fine (I am only doing this as part of a general catchup of old nominations). All the best. Storye book (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Storye book I'm donating Template:Did you know nominations/Amabilis uchoensis as a QPQ. SL93 (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, SL93 for generously donating the QPQ, which has been checked and is fine.
This nomination is good to go with ALT 0 or 0a, with ALT0a preferred. Storye book (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Promoting ALT0a to Prep 4 – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)