The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
... that staff have to be deployed to assist confused commuters alighting at Woodleigh MRT station by accident, having intended to alight at the next station and were unaware of the station's opening? Source: "Woodleigh MRT station finally opens – to some confusion". The Straits Times. Singapore Press Holdings. 21 June 2011.
ALT1: ... that Woodleigh MRT station was closed for three hours after a suspicious substance was found in various areas in the station? Source: [1]
ALT2: ... that due to the lack of developments in the area, Woodleigh MRT station was closed for operations for eight years since its completion in 2003? Source: [2]
Overall: Source spot checks look good (AGF on the offline sources per GA). I find the first hook (ALT0, if you will) the most interesting but was wondering whether it could be more concise. For example, "... that staff at the newly opened Woodleigh MRT station had to assist unaware commuters who accidentally alighted there?" would cut the hook by roughly 50 characters. This is not a pressing issue, so I'm passing the nom either way. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 10:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)