Template talk:2006 FIFA World Cup

Suggested revision to Template:World Cup 2006 stages

Rather than merge here, may I present an alternative, since the standings tables do not define the abbreviations? For knockout and the finals, then the FIFA 2006 template would suffice, as there would not be a standings table.—Twigboy 15:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Move request

Shouldn't this template be more appropriately named {{2006 FIFA World Cup}}? This is in line with naming convention for all other WC pages -- and FIFA should not be taken as an alias to the World Cup as they are two entirely different objects. The existing {{2006 FIFA World Cup}} should probably be better renamed to {{2006 FIFA World Cup finalists}}. --Pkchan 16:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has already moved the old {{2006 FIFA World Cup}} to {{2006 FIFA World Cup finalists}}. This template is subject to RM because admin help is required to make the move over the existing Template:2006 FIFA World Cup page (now a redirect). --Pkchan 13:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. -- Kjkolb 08:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FIFA 2006 → Template:2006 FIFA World Cup Rationale: In line with naming convention of other World Cup articles and templates. New name is more descriptive, as FIFA as the organiser of the World Cup should never been seen as alias to the event itself. Template:2006 FIFA World Cup already exists (as a redirect to another template), so admin's help is required here. Probably uncontroversial and can be speedied but for the last point. —Pkchan 16:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support -- Mareklug ^talk 21:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems sensible enough. Sam Vimes 22:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support not sure whether this is needed, but here's my vote anyway just in case. --Pkchan 10:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.