Jump to content

Template talk:Edmonton LRT future

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use

[edit]

Since this template hasn't been deleted, I guess we need to find a use for it. The only place I can see it useful is on Edmonton Light Rail Transit, under the infobox, replacing {{ETS LRT route}}, giving an outline of the entire system. Since there aren't articles for future stations, I think it isn't necessary to list them on articles for current stations, and Template:ETS LRT route will continue to be used there. 117Avenue (talk) 02:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First you need to do something about all the x20px you managed to stick in there. Useddenim (talk) 03:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you help a fellow Wikipedian out, and create them for me please? 117Avenue (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The missing icons are   (uvENDEer) and   (utBHF3+1) - but without knowing what they should look like, we can't really do anything. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
uvENDEer is the light rail version of   (vENDEer) and the mirror of   (uvENDEel). utBHF3+1 is the tunnel version of   (uBHF3+1). Sorry, but I thought the additional u and t were easy to figure out. 117Avenue (talk) 18:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Making   (uvENDEer) was easy; I just took BSicon_vENDEer.svg which is the source for   (vENDEer), put into a plain-text editor and altered the #BE2D2C to #003399 (BSicon_uvENDEel.svg which is the source for   (uvENDEel) is way more complicated than it needs to be, not just because of the sodipodi metadata - it sets the stroke colour to red and then overrides that with blue). --Redrose64 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For   (utBHF3+1) you could overlay   (uBHF legende) on   (utSTR3+1). --Redrose64 (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Useddenim (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see 4 proposed stations have been added, does that mean Useddenim intend to add the Energy and Festival Lines as well? What is the intended use of this template? 117Avenue (talk) 06:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have these locations been approved by St. Albert City Council as of yet? If no, they shouldn't be on here IMO. Hwy43 (talk) 07:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The only ref we have is from a presentation made to St. Albert residents February 23, 2013. 117Avenue (talk) 03:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. If content have not references somewhere it should not be in here. Should any references be in Edmonton Light Rail Transit and this template put there too? Is this a guess?Martin Morin (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Southwest Anthony Henday

[edit]

The freeway bridge graphic needs to be added between the future Twin Brooks station and the Llew Lawrence Operations & Maintenance Facility.– Jwkozak91 (talk) 00:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]