Template talk:Infobox chlorine

This template was considered for deletion on 3 April 2012. The result of the discussion was "keep".

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

The NFPA diamond is questionable.... Various sources report a different NFPA symbol for Chlorine (4, 0, 0, OX) NOT (3, 0, 2, ). followed citation, the diamond isn't even in the reported source. Recommend update to 4, 0, 0, OX 72.198.171.173 (talk) 15:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, current source says "NFPA Label N/A" Archived 2017-04-29 at the Wayback Machine.

We need a new source. Can you give yours? - DePiep (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marking as

Not done. No source provided. — MRD2014 ^Talk 12:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given this disagreement (and the fact that the diamond was uncited in the first place), I have removed the diamond. Double sharp (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

The image for chlorine was changed from the Chlorine in a bottle image to the chlorine liquid in an ampoule image. For context, the liquid in an ampoule image was the previous image before the bottle image was chosen to replace under the grounds that it showed more of the actual element in the state of the matter it usually appears in.

The reason that the editor User:Vitaium changed the image back to the original ampoule image was "Use better image to replace that previous nonsense image of chlorine in a bottle". I don't think this is a satisfactory reason to change the image back, so if nobody posts an objection on this topic in a few days I will change the image back to the Chlorine in a bottle image. OmegaMantis (talk) 22:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]