Template talk:Milan weatherbox
Appearance
This template was considered for deletion on 22 January 2011. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
The first two boxes
[edit]@PAper GOL The first two weatherboxes have much of the same scope, and take up too much space. I know you added the first one, but I think they need to be merged into one weatherbox.
(Also, for your later editing, could you keep precision the same between months, or at least leave the yearly value with one decimal, as to not go into false precision territory?) Uness232 (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- The second one said that it’s data is for 1991-2020 period, but in the sources section it turned out that only temperature was for that time.
- I can take care of it and merge them If it is really important.PAper GOL (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PAper GOLI don't think Milan needs 3 weatherboxes, so that would be good. If you so wish (or if you do not have time, I could also do the merge. Uness232 (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'd rather do it myself. I think I have time for the change tonight.PAper GOL (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see, thank you. Uness232 (talk) 21:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PAper GOL I ended up having time and doing it anyway. Please do mention any mistakes. Uness232 (talk) 21:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Everything looks alright.PAper GOL (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'd rather do it myself. I think I have time for the change tonight.PAper GOL (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PAper GOLI don't think Milan needs 3 weatherboxes, so that would be good. If you so wish (or if you do not have time, I could also do the merge. Uness232 (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)