Jump to content

Template talk:Networker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed?[edit]

How can the Class 168 be proposed? By all accounts it exists and isn't listed as a networker. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Class 325[edit]

The Class 325 not a networker, it is more related to the Mk3 family, unlike the electric networkers it has a DC/synchronous traction system rather then Three Phase GTO, the bodyshell is that of a Cl319. The only thing from a Networker is the cab!