Jump to content

Template talk:User fr-1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orange?

[edit]
Resolved
 – Not orange any more.

Why orange? – Omegatron 00:38, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Too big

[edit]
Resolved
 – Fixed.

This Template has more height then most of the others in my browser. Can someone fix it?--145.253.137.31 12:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki

[edit]
Resolved
 – Fixed.

The interwiki-links appear on my userspace even if they are within noinclude on this page. Could someone fix that? Spiby 14:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean what I think you mean, it was caused by someone's bot adding the interlang links to the wrong page. Should be fixed now. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Spiby 18:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

[edit]

Re: pouvoir [(to) may (do something); (to) have time to (do something), ...]: peux, peut → savoir [(to) be able to (do something), ...]: sais, sait == “savoir” (sais, sait) means you are able to do ..., but “pouvoir” (peux, peut) implys to have time to do .... Change it, please. Best regards Jens Liebenau (talk) 11:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC) (see German Wikipedia)[reply]
Addition: Corrige it, please. Sources are the literature and this page. Jens Liebenau (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC) (see German Wikipedia)[reply]

No way. Please do not cite automatic web translation tools as authority. The page you cited is partly garbage. ("il ne peut pas notre réparer ordinateur, Parc qu'il n'a pas ses outils " and ("il ne peut pas sa voiture take parce qu'il ya trop de neige sur les routes.") I'm not a native French speaker, but the sentence "Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français" looks fine to me. I will bow to the superior authority of a native speaker, not a web bot. --Cbdorsett (talk) 09:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
pouvoir can you use in the colloquial speech, but in the official speech you have normally to use savoir. In school I learned to do it in this way, because the other way is normally incorrect. So I ask you to correct it. Jens Liebenau (talk) 13:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Addition: Two websites in German: [1] and [2]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liebenau.jens (talkcontribs) 13:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Level of French knowledge

[edit]

I have been learning French for just over a year now. I am able to have a simple conversation, give someone directions, speak in different tenses etc. Do you think this is basic in Wikipedian terms in which case I can post this template to my user page? Thanks. 20:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit Req

[edit]

{{editrequest}} Could the template be updated to the code below: (I have not included the <noinclude> part as that should stay as is)

{{userbox-level
| level    = 1
| id       = [[French language|fr]]
| info     = Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau '''[[:Category:User fr-1|élémentaire]]''' de '''[[:Category:User fr|français]]'''.
| usercategory  = User fr
| usercategory2 = User fr-1
}}

This is to change it to use the userbox-level template which is used by other similar userboxes. Thanks -- WOSlinker (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing parameter

[edit]

{{editprotected}} It needs this parameter added, like almost all such userboxes have (and all should have):

| nocat = {{{nocat|}}}

This can be used to prevent double categorization when a user's babelbox templates are moved out into a user subpage that is transcluded on their main userpage. (See User:SMcCandlish/Babel for example). This change should be made to the rest of the templates in the fr-# series. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 12:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should make a botrequest. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 19:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Language tagging

[edit]

Please surround the French-language text with {{lang|fr| ... }}, for better accessibility. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 23:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- John of Reading (talk) 07:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]