User talk:ÆE/Paul Pantone

this page is a user account page made to look like a wikipedia article about Paul Pantone & possibly to promote the geet engine

I am guessing that bots and editors kept deleting the page as not notable. I am unsure if this violates the TOS but this is an interesting work around to that problem. Gbickford (talk) 06:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He has a habit of talking about himself in third person, especially to do with 'inventor abuse' which primarily stems from a legal battle in which he went to prison for not attending court, something he squarely blames on his lawyers (even though it's your responsibility to--when at court--listen to the proceedings closely and note down dates when they are organising when the next mention or hearing is (something which takes a good five to ten minutes of to and froing as both legal parties have to check their availability) and try and make sure you actually rock up on the date. Instead, he claims that they sent him a letter after the date in question intentionally causing a warrant to be issued for his arrest, in some places it's claimed they 'betrayed him' (usually again written by Patone by himself but talking in third person which makes things quite confusing).

Then things start getting weird. Claims usually quickly devolve into being that the entire purpose is to get him into a mental asylum so 'big pharma' (his words not mine) can inject him with drug cocktails which will irreparably harm his creativity and mental faculty.

From my research this is a very common line of thought among those who believe in magical pseudoscientific ways to generate alternative energy, especially anything to do with magnets or polarity. Pantone claims the 'reactor rod' (a metal rod in a hose or chamber) needs to be aligned north/south at some portion of his woo talk about how to use his 'GEET technology' which I would say qualifies him for 'zany magnet energy cult' type of woo peddler in my books, even though you can strip out every element of his patent from this 'technology' and recreate the same results using just a jar and a piece of hose and run most small motors on petrol fumes put straight in the air filter.

I am sure that magic energy 'inventors' would get absolutely slammed if they managed to get articles on Wikipedia. In fact, I strongly feel that we should ease up on the notability requirements for pseudoscientists or people who have batshit insane claims that--as part of their general interaction with their fan base--ask that everyone censor all comments on videos of this 'technology' so nothing calling out the fact that every bit of the 'invention' besides the hose and the jar is just flim flam. I feel that if we lowered the bar and let them all have their own wikipedia pages within a few weeks they'll be requesting NN-deletion THEMSELVES to avoid the logic, reason, and light of truth that they'd have exposing them. And just like cockroaches, when the lights go on flim flam pseudoscientists scuttle under your furniture and whitegoods like cowards.

So please, if there ever does happen to be a page of this GEET crap, or if anyone ever finds alternative energy woo peddler articles on Wikipedia in general, please, please, please drop me a message on my talk page. I'll happily research and recreate ANY 'free energy' machine online, even if I have to reverse engineer it at considerable time and financial cost of my own, just to expose these charlatans who exploit the good natured simple minded idiots of YouTube into zany alien reptillian death cults of woo and foaming at the mouth big pharma anti vaccine drivel. There's too much woo on the internet, it's the primary source of bad science and horrible logic in our current era, and it needs to be fought tooth and nail by men and women of science, reason, and logic. It goes against EVERYTHING Wikipedia stands for too, so letting them enjoy the exposure Wiki will give their woo inventions may be poetic justice! Who knows! BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's "woo"? And why not set up a wiki article on the history of "free energy claims and scams"? That is certainly valuable, educational material. 70.39.231.44 (talk) 13:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't there a typical Wiki article on this guy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.36.210 (talk) 06:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because this guy was a completely insane scam artist who tried peddling his insane bullshit claims to everybody who would listen. He is nobody of note as nobody knows who the hell he is. Hes just some random crazy person who read a physics book or two and decided he knew the secrets of energy production.108.183.124.35 (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've unreliably sourced everything you wrote here. You are now a flying unicorn. 84.106.26.81 (talk) 14:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]