User talk:Ентусиастъ

Welcome

Hello, Ентусиастъ, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Dimo Kazasov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dimo Kazasov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. He's clearly notable, but the single source does not have enough information to satisfy WP:VERIFY, and the article could do with more references and footnotes.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimo Kazasov (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dimo Kazasov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dimo Kazasov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ентусиастъ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hi Ентусиастъ! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 1963 Skopje earthquake that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 10:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, my bad. Thank you for notifying me Ентусиастъ (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi Ентусиастъ! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Alexander Lukashenko that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 23:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian parliament seats

Hello Ентусиастъ, I hope this finds you well. Regarding your changes to the various parties for their respective number of Bulgarian parliament seats, setting the number of seats for the party to 0/240 tells the reader that of 240 members of parliament, the party has zero seats. This is, of course, not true. As you noted, the parliament has been dissolved, however that does not mean the party seats were lost, but simply that all of the members are sent out of office. Even if the dissolution did mean all seats were lost (i.e. Bulgaria no longer had a parliament), this would imply 0/0 seats rather than 0/240, in which case parliament seats parameter would just be removed entirely from the infobox. Best, Soapwort (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration

Hi, please be aware of Wikipedia’s guidelines about transliteration going foreign names to English, particularly the policy for article titles (WP:TRANSLITERATE). Generally, if there is a well-established spelling for a name in English sources, Wikipedia should use that spelling. For example, most sources about the founder of Zero Hedge use the spelling ”Ivandjiiski”, and Wikipedia should reflect this common name spelling. POLITANVM ^talk 18:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Old Prussian language into Language revitalization. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @DanCherek:. Yes, I was aware that one shouldn't copy in Wikipedia itself but nevertheless wanted to add the info because it's its place there. If someone wishes, one can change/crop the passage. Thank you for your notes. The next time I copy something, I'll add a linking to the original page. Ентусиастъ (talk) 17:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think it was a great addition to the article. Copying within Wikipedia is perfectly fine as long as you indicate in the summary where you're getting it from. Hope that makes sense. Happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dimo Kazasov

Hello, Ентусиастъ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dimo Kazasov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimo Kazasov has been accepted

Dimo Kazasov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your WP:RMT request

Your request at WP:RMT was reverted, as it was listed incorrectly. Please to not replace the request template but copy it instead, then paste it under the notice, and then fill out the parameters. Thank you. Colonestarrice (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to say the same, but more importantly to say that this particular request was very far from controversial and would not have been accepted anyway. Instead, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial. Lennart97 (talk) 16:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article that I wanted to be moved is NON-CONTROVERSIAL per se. Just saying. Ентусиастъ (talk) 16:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then I look forward to seeing your RM succeed with unanimous support. Lennart97 (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russo-Ukrainian war

Please adhere to WP:NPOV. You seem to have a problem with Russian statements but not with Ukrainian ones. While I know Russian statements aren't always accurate that doesn't mean they always are inaccurate. And your accusations of me being a troll and being pro-Russian are against civil behavior which is required here. Please don't do this. Or I will be forced to complain. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this on Talk:Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine#Violation of WP:NPOV by User:Ентусиастъ instead of unilateral reverts. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 10:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Hi, I just wanted to make a quick comment about your username. As per Wikipedia:Username policy, a non-Latin username is allowed, but can be problematic. From Wikipedia:Signatures;

Non-Latin Signatures

Editors with non-Latin usernames are welcome to edit in Wikipedia. However, non-Latin scripts, such as Arabic, Armenian, Chinese, Cyrillic, Greek, Hebrew, Indic scripts, Japanese, Korean, Persian, Thai and others, are illegible to most other contributors of the English Wikipedia. Not everyone uses a keyboard that has immediate access to non-Latin characters, and names that cannot be pronounced cannot be retained in memory. As a courtesy to the rest of the contributors, users with such usernames are encouraged to sign their posts (at least in part) with Latin characters. For an example refer to User:Παράδειγμα, who signs his posts as "Παράδειγμα/Paradigma."

I understand your username is apparently Bulgarian, and seems to translate to "Enthusiast". I'm not sure what the significance of that is to you, but if you would consider adding that, or another Latinized name or word to your signature, (eg: Ентусиастъ/Enthusiast), it would make interacting with you a great deal easier for your fellow editors.

To attach a Latinized word or name to your signature, just go to "Preferences", and on the first page, under "User Profile", scroll down to "Signatures". There you will see a text box where you can customize your signature to your liking and you will be able to modify it with an add-on in Latin script that will help others identify and communicate with you. There are additional instructions at Wikipedia:Signature tutorial, and at the bottom of the page you will find a list of unique, colorful and creative signatures, just as you will see throughout Wikipedia, that may help give you some ideas. If you need any assistance, you can contact the Help Desk. I hope you find this useful and, happy editing! - wolf 17:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks, I'll add a transliteration. Ентусиастъ (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: Following the example that was given above, I added the transliteration. I hope things are alright now. Cheers Ентусиастъ/Entusiast (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's appreciated, thank you. - wolf 17:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jingiby Джинги, първо, че се познаваме от бг уикито (същи са ни потребителските имена и тук и там), така че може и на български и второ съм в EN wiki от няколко години, та няма нужда от разяснителни бележки:) Според мен е важно да се отбележи при Мисирков какво сам е написал в анкетния лист (все пак е сложена снимка така и така) и няма нищо общо със стила на статията, нито го нарушава/затруднява по какъвто и да е начин, но както и да е (btw такива уточнения при снимки се правят често в статиите в англоезичната уики). :) Поздрави, Ентусиастъ/Entusiast (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей Ентусиастъ/Entusiast, понеже все пак тази снимка аз към я качил в Уикито, си мисля, че многото излишни и повтарящи се обяснения на едно и също нещо са ненужни и имет по-скоро обратен ефект. Поздрав. Jingiby (talk) 03:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you recently removed content from Recreational drug use without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GenoV84 (talk) 11:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

If the article title is the same as the Wikilink text, you do not need to repeat it. For example, you do not need to write [[Korean Armistice Agreement|Korean Armstice Agreement]], you can just write [[Korean Armistice Agreement]]. All the best, Yue🌙 03:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the advice. I don't know too how I messed it up. I guess because I was in a hurry. All the best to you, too :) Ентусиастъ/Entusiast (talk) 06:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]