Jump to content

User talk:Кардам

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello :)

[edit]

Hola Кардам, realizas importantes ediciones en la Wikipedia en español, que te parece este antigulo Ranking que data de enero de 2006: Wikipedia:Lista de wikipedistas por número de ediciones; cuando yo todavia no tenia ninguna cuenta. Saludos cordiales -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 15:13 5 mar 2011 (UTC)

Ranking de usuarios peruanos

[edit]

Lista de usuarios peruanos por ediciones en Wikipedia en español. (1 abril 2010)

  1. Andreasmperu - 29970 ediciones (67)
  2. Mercenario97 - 28774 ediciones (74)
  3. Axxgreazz - 27404 ediciones (84)
  4. Mansoncc - 26376 ediciones (89)
  5. Manuel González Olaechea y Franco - 24710 ediciones (104)
  6. Huhsunqu - 22187 ediciones (123)
  7. Dreitmen - 18521 ediciones (175)
  8. Arístides Herrera Cuntti - 15077 ediciones (inactivo 4 años) (215)
  9. Globalphilosophy - 12649 ediciones (272)
  10. Fidelmoquegua - 11863 ediciones (295)
  11. Chalisimo5 - 11264 ediciones (313)
  12. Chico512 - 10963 ediciones (317)
  13. Fvmeteo - 7677 ediciones (443)
  14. ARHEKI - 7401 ediciones (456)
  15. Kanon6996 - ¿? ediciones
  16. Miguel Chong - ¿? ediciones
  17. ¿? Etc….
  • Ranking de usuarios peruanos
  • Lista de usuarios peruanos por creaciones en Wikipedia en español. (marzo 2010)
  1. Miguel Chong - 1070 creaciones (44)
  2. Chalisimo5 - 683 creaciones (75)
  3. Globalphilosophy - 601 creaciones (90)
  4. Andreasmperu – 546 creaciones (105)
  5. ARHEKI – 496 creaciones (122)
  6. Huhsunqu - 316 creaciones (218)
  7. Manuel González Olaechea y Franco - 256 creaciones (281)
  8. Arístides Herrera Cuntti - 206 creaciones (360)
  9. Etc….

Datos aproximados. -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 15:21 5 mar 2011 (UTC)

Prespa

[edit]

I was thinking of translating it two weeks ago but then started working on other aricles :) I will translate it today or tomorrow :) Best, --Gligan (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Well, I can translate it, but I think that there is no point because the content in that article is going to be included in the article Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria. The background section of the Bulgarian article is already largely included (but in more detail) in the first two sections of the Conquest and the military actions are going to be in the next section, "Campaign of 976". However, I don't know when I will have time to finish with the Byzantine conquest because before that I would like to go to the library and read on that in the second volume of "History of Bulgaria" by BAN. That was my basis for the article of Samuel. ¡Saludos! --Gligan (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
¡Hola! I think you can upload it but better ask someone from the Spanish Wikipedia about the license. ¡Saludos! --Gligan (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Анна (Иван Асен II)

[edit]

Hello, Кардам! Yes, this is a good idea for an article, and I'll be glad to work on it as soon as I can, perhaps in the next few days or at least in the next week (I'd like to finish this one first).

By the way, I find your interest in Bulgaria to be really heart-warming and I truly appreciate it. I noticed that you are from Peru; do you happen to be a Peruvian of some Bulgarian descent, or how did your fascination with Bulgarian history develop? Just curious :) Best wishes and thanks for all your articles about medieval Bulgaria in Spanish! Toдor Boжinov 18:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You may find the article here: Anna (Anisia). Best, Toдor Boжinov 18:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Žižka

[edit]

Hello. I am now quite busy, so I don't have time to translate the article but if you would create that article on EN Wiki anyways, I would try to help you out. - Darwinek (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of Samuel of Bulgaria

[edit]

The article Samuel of Bulgaria you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Samuel of Bulgaria for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria in the Spanish Wikipedia

[edit]

Greetings! I am sorry that I could not answer earlier. Unfortunately I don't know any Bulgarians who can speak Spanish but I guess that if the Project is created there could be interest because there are many Bulgarians who live in Spain. I would like to congratulate you for your work on the history of Bulgaria; it is really amazing that you have already made four good articles with virtually no help, that is truly a great achievement. And having in mind that before you started editing there was almost nothing about medieval Bulgaria in the Spanish Wikipedia, it is nice that you have such an interest. Un saludo, --Gligan (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola! I have created the article - here it is. It is quite short because there is almost no information about the siege... ¡Saludos!

Trabzon Castle

[edit]

Trabzon Castle Yes it is the castle of the Grand Komnenos --Macukali (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips to help you out!

[edit]

Hi Кардам, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Кардам/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talkstalk!) 13:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How references work

[edit]

Simple references

[edit]

These require two parts;

a)
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";
== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Кардам/reftest and try it out.

Named references

[edit]
Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

[edit]

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Here's a little bit of magic which can save you an awful lot of time and effort!

[edit]

You might want to consider using this tool - (tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py) - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well all by itself. For those it can;t do by itself, it gives you a pull-down (or up) menu of templates to choose from, which you can then fill in manually. Often the problem is "No title found" - sometimes the title is obvious (especially if it's a pdf), bit, if not, just open the page yourself and choose soemthing appropriate if there's not already a clear title there. Happy editing! Pesky (talkstalk!) 13:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shishman (son of Michael Shishman)

[edit]

I have edited the article as best as I could, following the Bulgarian article. I am really glad that you are back :) Saludos! --Gligan (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yanuka

[edit]

Hi! I'll see what I can do, though I suspect it won't be in the coming weekend. I'm pretty sure the books I have available would have some useful info on this person. Toдor Boжinov 08:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Boniface I, Marquess of Montferrat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Земља Војиновића

[edit]

Well I am really not sure what would be the best title. I suppose it is the best just to leave it as Zemlja Vojinovića and than in first sentence in article write Zemlja Vojinovića (Serbian Cyrillic: Земља Војиновића English: Vojinović Land/Vojinović Oblast was short-lasting medieval Oblast... For English part you should see which type of subdivision it was Template:Terms for types of country subdivisions. Per article on Serbian Wikipedia it was oblast but I don't know sr:Земља Војиновића. I see that Greek Wikipedia translate it as el:Χώρα του Βοΐνοβιτς but I think we maybe should keep practice established with Republika Srpska, Altai Krai, Novgorod Oblast, Sambir Raion... You may also ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbia or Wikipedia:WikiProject Montenegro... All the best.--MirkoS18 (talk) 14:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)--MirkoS18 (talk) 14:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas II d'Autremencourt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guy de la Roche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Кардам. You have new messages at Rinkle gorge's talk page.
Message added 16:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Rinkle gorge (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ghisi and Co

[edit]

Hi. I never encountered a date of death given as "after 1243", nor "1266". He must have die between october 1238 (last document where is is mentionned as alive and still in possession of Andros), and August 1243 (date of the begin of the process of the Ghisi at Venice, where he is mentionned as dead[1]).--Phso2 (talk) 05:58, 15 March 2014 (UTC) (sorry I thought you were asking about Marino Dandolo)[reply]

Andrea was still alive in February 1260(Setton p431 n129[2]) when he made an acknowledgement of debt. He was already dead in March 1277 (Loenertz, Les Ghisi, p 43). Setton thinks he died around 60-61 (same page).--Phso2 (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC) PS. The date of 1266 is given instead of 1260 for the acknowledgement of debt in Loenertz' Les Ghisi - but it is probably a lapsus, as corrected by Setton (p431) because the original document - published in Loenertz' book - does say "1260".[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Despotate of Sinope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Nymphaeum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Despotate of Sinope listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Despotate of Sinope. Since you had some involvement with the Despotate of Sinope redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Constantine 07:48, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Despotate of Sinope for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Despotate of Sinope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Despotate of Sinope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine 09:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James II of Avesnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hainaut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tedisio Zaccaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genoese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoffrey II of Briel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John of Dournay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Navarino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited County palatine of Cephalonia and Zakynthos, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turks, Arta and Castle of Saint George. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Кардам. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Кардам. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Кардам. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Кардам. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A map

[edit]

I guess you are the author of the map "File:CharlesdeAnjouempire.JPG". Do you have time to create the same map with English text? Perhaps Anjou and Maine could also be added and the color could be more distinctive as per a reviewer's remark here: [3]. Thank you for your time. Borsoka (talk) 05:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the map. I highly appreciate your prompt action. Borsoka (talk) 16:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County Palatine of Cephalonia and Zakynthos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jevdokija Balšić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Despot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]