User talk:131.170.90.6

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 131.170.90.6, is registered to RMIT University and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Immunohistochemistry worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Subaru WRX. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps ^{T • C} 03:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Subaru Impreza WRX, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Subaru Impreza WRX was changed by 131.170.90.6 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-09-24T03:55:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Subaru Impreza WRX STI, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Subaru Impreza WRX STI was changed by 131.170.90.6 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-09-24T04:05:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Deville (Talk) 04:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Bairnsdale, Victoria, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ipatrol (talk) 01:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Get Cereal TV has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 07:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Services marketing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Siberian pipeline sabotage has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. HarlandQPitt (talk) 05:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Serial ATA. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Graham87 08:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Unmanned aerial vehicle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 23:54, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Architecture of ancient Rome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ibn (talk) 07:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Windows Server 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 06:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jasper Jacks has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Jasper Jacks. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Tiderolls 00:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 00:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Soleus muscle, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Click here to submit a false positive report.
Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 01:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Qualifications Framework, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bubba, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spencer^T♦C 21:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ivica Olić. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 05:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 August 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Min Ho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hintha(t) 04:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Bound for Glory (2011), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Abdul-Qādir Bēdil, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Calabe1992 (talk) 02:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Ray Kroc has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 08:34, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Exchange rate with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 06:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flo Rida, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That's your opinion, and adding it to the article borders on vandalism. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blossom Dearie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 23:29, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Survivor: One World, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 01:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to List of Australian criminals, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Thebestofall007. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to RMIT University because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thebestofall007 (talk) 06:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013

Hello, I'm ObjectivismLover. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Timeline of Melbourne history because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ObjectivismLover (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Skorpios may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Bicentennial Man (film), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at (500) Days of Summer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Widr (talk) 05:44, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Bangladeshi people, you may be blocked from editing. AmaryllisGardener (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

Hello, I'm Acabashi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ixodes scapularis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Acabashi (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2014

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to South Sudan has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Melbourne Critical Mass has been reverted.
Your edit here to Melbourne Critical Mass was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.flickr.com/photos/andersondotcom/4391953644/in/photostream/lightbox/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2016

Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tau without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dr Greg talk 21:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.