User talk:192.33.17.252

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mission Concepcion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mission Concepcion was changed by 192.33.17.252 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968645 on 2017-09-19T18:07:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Osteosarcoma has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Osteosarcoma was changed by 192.33.17.252 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938217 on 2017-10-18T15:24:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Coaching— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LakesideMiners (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: CinderyBison204 (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CinderyBison204 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CinderyBison204, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, 192.33.17.252! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:CinderyBison204

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:CinderyBison204, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, I'm Zawl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Color terminology for race— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Zawl 17:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of space exploration. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Timeline of space exploration was changed by 192.33.17.252 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890186 on 2018-02-14T19:14:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Timeline of space exploration, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Comet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Comet was changed by 192.33.17.252 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943504 on 2018-03-02T21:13:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Comet. Qzd (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to September 1921 San Antonio floods— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 15:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Skyward, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 16:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to William E. Forbes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oregon Treaty have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---