Jump to content

User talk:23.91.108.10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (23.91.108.10) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Ebyabe (talk) 17:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Armie Hammer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Consensus

[edit]

As it stands, there are two editors that have reverted you so you will need to get consensus on the talk page to make the changes (add children's names) that you want to make. If you just revert again without doing so, you will be blocked. Given that you are on a Zenlayer proxy, you are on thin ice.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still disruptive editing

[edit]

I'm glad to see that you have heeded the warnings here not to add the children's names to the article again - not until you get consensus. But now you are engaging in another disruptive behavior: taking your argument to other people's talk pages. I count five people whose pages you have gone to with this crusade of yours - often going back to them multiple times even after they have asked you to stop or deleted your comments. This is disruptive and could result in sanctions against you if you keep it up. Basically, your one option here is to discuss it on the talk page. If a consensus of people there disagree with you, then that is the end of it. Move on to something else. --MelanieN (talk) 23:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]