User talk:24601Forever

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Methven (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabelle Methven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 21:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 24601Forever, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam ^Sing! 21:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Methven (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabelle Methven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Isabelle Methven concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Isabelle Methven, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isabelle Methven

Hello, 24601Forever. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Isabelle Methven".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 18:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...my page I was creating was deleted. I was hoping to be able to edit it and have it published?

It was Called Isabelle Methven

I am rubbish at all this computer coding and publishing things, and can't work out how to resurrect it.

Can anyone please help me?

Thanks

24601Forever (talk) 12:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the page, you can find it at Draft:Isabelle Methven. I also responded to your post at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#‎Deleted article. Based on your post there, I think you need to read a couple pages before you go to far.

Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, since you say that Isabelle Methven is your daughter.
Wikipedia:Your first article, it will help you learn about what is expected to be in articles and how they should look.

If you have any questions, please ask either here or you can go back to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions and ask. -- GB fan 13:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 24601Forever. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Isabelle Methven, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]