User talk:330763Time

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middleamericajames. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 12:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

330763Time (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a "sock puppet." I am not middleamericajames, no matter how bad you want me to be. You are wrong and this is harassment. Unless you have some form of digital evidence, IP addresses, your claims are spurious and without merit. Matthew Berdyck is known all over the country and it's unreasonable to basically accuse every human being that defends Matthew of being the same person. Your conduct is disgusting, hurtful, and you are defaming Mr Berdyck without cause. 330763Time (talk) 14:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser says you and he are technically indistinguishable from one another. Without going into excessive detail as to what exactly CU looks for, there is evidence. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 16:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]