User talk:84.13.151.122

June 2021

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:Mutt Lunker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 19:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

How did I purposefully and blatantly harass User talk:Mutt Lunker?

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

84.13.151.122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've never been blocked on Wikipedia. I was in fact warned by a user named BilCat which you can see here in this thread, but the incessant reverting of every edit I made across many different articles began long before I made the comment which resulted in the warning from BilCat. 84.13.151.122 (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, obviously you have been blocked before – as Special:Contributions/92.7.141.169. You can't use Wikipedia as a soapbox to tell the world the truth. You can start a blog if you want to do that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain to me how exactly that is 'obvious'? You can't use an encyclopedia to tell the world objective truths and facts? Wow...

"In the future and for the record, this should be treated as if 92.14.216.40 was blocked indefinitely".-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright you're going to have to explain what exactly this means to me. I've taken a look through your link and I'm assuming you're suggesting I'm the same person in this 'investigation', yes? Their edits don't seem particularly similar to mine at all, very different subjects with only a minimal crossover.

Latest IP sock

Now active as User talk:78.147.184.24. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.