User talk:ABIDALAA
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, ABIDALAA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Please see WP:LINKROT for how to format sources that have links and WP:V for what constitutes acceptable sources. Let me know if you have any questions. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kaftan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer
[edit]i believe i refer to source with page number , along side other source just in case , such as use of kaftan since Marinid Sultanate , pre dating ottoman entry to africa[1] as i also correct the page use in other book , as in fact i use reliable sources , removing my editing base solely on your personal beliefs and ideology is abuse of power
Edit warring
[edit]Your recent editing history at Kaftan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M.Bitton (talk) 23:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Al Mahbes (1985), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Both changes i made do Not use any source , rather they are made from POV , can i ask by what right are you asking me to site source while removing statement that clearly has made from POV ?
- ^ اللباس المغربي من بداية الدولة المرينية إلى العصر السعدي". محمد مقر. 2006. p349