Jump to content

User talk:Aa3z4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Amena! This is Anne-Marie! Evolution43 (talk) 04:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Aa3z4, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Materials

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References for Wikipedia Topic: Sexual Size Dimorphism in Galiformes Birds

[edit]

Hello! References for my topic can be found below. Feel free to add any comments or suggestions about any of the articles.

1. Drovetski, S. V., Rohwer, S., & Mode, N. A. 2006. Role of sexual and natural selection in evolution of body size and shape: a phylogenetic study of morphological radiation in grouse. Journal Of Evolutionary Biology, 19(4), 1083-1091.

2. Isomursu, M., Rätti, O., Helle, P., & Hollmén, T. 2006. Sex and age influence intestinal parasite burden in three boreal grouse species. Journal Of Avian Biology, 37(5), 516-522.

3. Lislevand, T., Figuerola, J., & Székely, T. 2009. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division. Journal Of Evolutionary Biology, 22(9), 1895-1905.

4. Remeš, V., & Székely, T. 2010. Domestic chickens defy Rensch's rule: sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds V. Remeš and T. Székely Sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. Journal Of Evolutionary Biology, 23(12), 2754-2759.


You might want to move this to the page of your organism so more folks can see the references. #2 does not look as relevant as the other ones. You might look for a general sexual size dimorphism in birds reference instead of #4. — Preceding unsigned Evol&Glass (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC) comment added by Evol&Glass (talkcontribs) 18:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]