User talk:Abhaybeniwalreengus

March 2023

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Reengus have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 23:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Parbatsar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 07:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Abhaybeniwalreengus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sunny Deol that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 20:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Dinesh Kumar (chemist). Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Dinesh Kumar (chemist) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dinesh Kumar (chemist). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh Kumar (chemist) (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinesh Kumar (chemist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Abhaybeniwalreengus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Ajay Bhukar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajay Bhukar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Endrabcwizart (talk) 07:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Bhukar (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Bhukar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Dinesh Kumar (chemist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinesh Kumar (chemist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Kumar (chemist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

@Curb Safe Charmer Can you provide the exact sentence or information in this article due to which this article is nominated for deletion. Abhaybeniwalreengus (talk) 08:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

@Abhaybeniwalreengus: please read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Kumar (chemist). Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

@Curb Safe Charmer I already mentioned the source for the listing in top 2% Scientist and the listing is for 2021 year only and you checked the 2023 year ranking. Abhaybeniwalreengus (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

this top 2% scientist list is prepared by Stanford University which is based on one year impact(2020) Abhaybeniwalreengus (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

This isn't the place to discuss whether or not there should be an article about him. Please make your comments here instead. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Reengus

Hello, Abhaybeniwalreengus,

Why did you move this 17 year old article to Draft space? Although you reverted your page move, please do not do this in the future. Long-standing articles should only be moved after a consensus decision on the article talk page. Please do not move pages just because you have the ability to do so. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

@Liz Right, this mistake will not happen in future Abhaybeniwalreengus (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Abhaybeniwalreengus. Thank you for your work on Virendra Singh (Danta Ramgarh). User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add the appropriate infobox

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:44, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Banshidhar Bajiya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Banshidhar Bajiya. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

@Eejit43 thanks Abhaybeniwalreengus (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banshidhar Bajiya has been accepted

Banshidhar Bajiya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Kotri Dhaylan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kotri Dhaylan. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it is poorly sourced, and may be a copyright violation or close paraphrasing of a translation of one of the sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abhaybeniwalreengus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Kotri Dhaylan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotri Dhaylan (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Kotri Dhaylan may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Partial block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Dinesh Kumar (chemist) and Talk:Dinesh Kumar (chemist) for continuing to edit the article in question while the conflict of interest disclosure above (permalink) remains unanswered.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 03:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhaybeniwalreengus. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 06:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhaybeniwalreengus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have read the Wikipedia rules regarding editing wiki and now I understood the things that i have done earlier which made me blocked from editing wiki but from now I will write only genuine or notable information on Wikipedia from reliable sources and I assure you that I will never use my Wiki account for sockpuppetry in future, so i request Wikipedia to unblock my account so that I can contribute to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

This wasn't a question of not knowing the rules. This was a question of you setting up other accounts in an attempt to mislead us. By doing so, you have demonstrated we cannot trust your honesty. Nor have you addressed the concerns with WP:COI. The only reasonable path forward is for you to go at least six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you will need to address your violations of WP:COI, your deliberate dishonesty, and you will need to convince us your future edits would be significantly different from your prior edits. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Dinesh Kumar (chemist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinesh Kumar (chemist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Kumar (chemist) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 19:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhaybeniwalreengus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, my Wikipedia accounts were blocked approximately 6-7 months ago due to my disruptive editing and the formation of multiple sockpuppet accounts. Specifically, I created an article titled Dinesh Kumar (chemist) in which I had a conflict of interest due to a personal connection. When this article nominated for deletion, I created a sockpuppet account (@Dippswrite) to vote in its favor, which was a violation of Wikipedia's guidelines. And then, I created more sockpuppet accounts like @Asbchoudhary9, @DineshSingh01, and @EncyclopediaEagle to evade the Wikipedia blocks.

I would like to request Wikipedia administrators to permanently ban these sockpuppet accounts while considering the unblocking of my original account. I understand that I had a conflict of interest with the articles I created, such as Dinesh Kumar (chemist) and Kotri Dhaylan (my village). If my block is lifted, I commit to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and not engaging in disruptive editing as I did in the past. Abhaybeniwalreengus (talk) 13:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I see no reason to lift this block, given that the bad behavior has continued. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Banned

As you have continued to evade your block with the  Confirmed sockpuppet account, WikiAnchor10, you are now considered banned by the community under WP:3X. No admin is free to unilaterally lift your ban. --Yamla (talk) 13:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)